英国的研究质量评估体系

英国的研究质量评估体系

ID:46007009

大小:67.00 KB

页数:3页

时间:2019-11-20

英国的研究质量评估体系_第1页
英国的研究质量评估体系_第2页
英国的研究质量评估体系_第3页
资源描述:

《英国的研究质量评估体系》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库

1、TheResearchAssessmentExercise(RAE)isanexerciseundcrtakonapproximatelyevery5yearsonbehalfofthefourUKhighereducationfundingcouncils(HEFCE,SHEFC,HEFCW,DELNI)toevaluatethequalityofresearchundertakenbyBritishhighereducationinstitutions.RAEsubmissionsfromeachsubjectarea(orunitofasse

2、ssment)aregivenarankbyasubjectspecialistpeerreviewpanel.Therankingsareusedtoinformtheallocationofqualityweightedresearchfunding(QR)eachhighereducationinstitutionreceivesfromtheirnationalfundingcounci1.PreviousRAEstookplacein1986,1989,1992,1996and2001.Themostrecentresultswerepu

3、blishedinDecember2008.Variousmediahaveproduced1eaguetablesofinstitutionsanddisclplinesbasedonthe2008RAEresults.Differentmethodologiesleadtosimilarbutnon-identicalrankings.AssessmentprocessTheassessmentprocessfortheRAEfocusesonqualityofresearchoutputs(whichusuallymeanspaperspub

4、lishedinacademicjournalsandconferenceproceedings),researchenvironment,andindicatorsofesteem.Eachsubjectpaneldeterminespreciseruleswithingeneralguidance.ForRAE2008,institutionsareinvitedtosubmitfourresearchoutputs,publishedbetweenJanuary2001andDecember2007,foreachfull-timemembe

5、rofstaffselectedforinclusion.—Inresponsetocriticismofearlierassessments,anddevelopmentsinemploymentlaw,the2008RAEdoesmoretotakeintoaccountpart-timeworkersorthosenewtoasufficientlevelofsenioritytobeincludedintheprocess.[edit]CriticismTheRAEhasnotbeenwithoutitscritics.Amongstthe

6、criticismsisthefactthatitexplicitlyignoresthepublicationsofmostfull-timeresearchersintheUK,onthegroundsthattheyareemployedonfixedtermcontracts.AccordingtotheRAE2008guidelines,mostresearchassistantsare"noteligibletobelistedasresearchactivestaff".固Publicationsbyresearchersonfixe

7、dtermcontractsareexcludedfromtheAsscssmcntExerciseunlessthosepublicationscanbecreditedtoamemberofstaffwhoiseligiblefortheRAE.Thisappliesevenifthememberofstaffbeingassessedonlymadeaminorcontributiontothearticle.Anotherissueisthatitisdoubtfulwhetherpanelsofexpertshavethencccssar

8、yexpertisetoevaluatethequalityofresearchoutputs,asexpertsperf

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。