100614 日本帝人防弹丝规格对比

《100614 日本帝人防弹丝规格对比》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、Technora®AramidFiber芳纶纤维TechnoraSectionPara-AramidBusinessDepartmentTeijinTechnoProductsLimitedTechnora组准芳纶事业部帝人化工技术产品有限公司Confidential1OutlineofTechnora(R)Technora®ispara-aramidfiberindependentlydevelopedbyTeijin(Technora®是位芳纶纤维由帝人自主开发)It’smadefromco

2、polymers&producedbydifferentprocessfromPPTA’s(它是由不同的进程作出了从生产共聚物及芳纶的)Technora(R):co-poly-(paraphenylene/3,4’-oxydiphenyleneterephthalamide)PPTA:poly-(paraphenyleneterephthalamide)2ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateBasicPropertiesTechnora和Polyary

3、late基本性质比较Technora®PolyarylateDenier(丹尼爾)Dtex(分特)220220Strength（強度）cN/dtex24.522.9Elongation（伸度）%4.03.8Modulus（剛性）cN/dtex602530Density（密度）g/cm31.391.41MoistureRegain（水分率）%2.00.04Finishingoil（潤滑油剤）%2.5-Technora®hashigherstrengthandelongationthanOthers

4、.Technora比較其他材料具有较高的强度和延伸率3ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateHeatResistanceTechnora和Polyarylate耐热比较Technora®PolyarylateDecompositionTemp.（分解温度）DegreeCC度數500400

5、(空气中的收缩)(400C)%0.84.5HeatresistantpropertyofTechnora®andPPTAisbetterthanPolyarylateTechnora和PPTA比Polyarylate耐热性能更好4ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateMITBendingFatigueTechnora和Polyarylate麻省理工学院的弯曲疲劳比较LoadBendingpointSample[Yarn]Technorashowshigh

6、fatigueresistance.Technora具有较高的抗疲劳麻省理工本辛疲劳弯曲断裂循环5Compressivefatigueresistance(抗压耐疲劳)Rubbersheet橡胶板Aluminum铝SampleCord樣品Load50and100kgf×10timesCompressionFace(压面):22mmx22mm（4.84cm2）CompressionPoint（Cross）压缩点（十字）Thickness(厚度)7mmThickness(厚度)3mmCyclespe

7、ed3seconds/cycle(Headspeed；10mm/minutes)循环速度3秒/周期（杆头速度;10mm/minutes）最大荷重：100kgfTestmethod试验方法6Compressivefatigueresistance抗压耐疲劳TechnoracankeephighretentionagainstcompressionTechnora可以保持对高压缩保留保留实力抗压耐疲劳7Compressivefatigueresistance抗压耐疲劳Theapparentpictu

8、rebeforeandafterthecompressivetest这些明显的图片前，后压缩试验测试前侧面正面直径宽度8HeatResistance比较Technora和Polyarylate耐热性Retentionofstrengthaftersoakinginsolderfor3seconds浸泡后的强度保持3秒焊Soakingtemperature浸种温度Technora®PolyarylateBlank坯件％100100300C％9984350C％9949400C％81Melt(熔化)H