a meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects：在无意识的思想影响的meta分析

《a meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects：在无意识的思想影响的meta分析》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、Ameta-analysisonunconsciousthoughteffectsMadelijnStrickApDijksterhuisMaartenW.BosAukjeSjoerdmaRickB.vanBaarenLoranF.NordgrenThisisapreliminaryanalysisthatwillberegularlyupdatedonourwebsite(www.unconsciouslab.com).Donotcitethispaperwithoutpermissionofthefirstorsecondauthor.ParagraphContentPa

2、ge1Abstract32Introduction43Method·StudiesIncluded·DependentOutcomeMeasures·Effect-SizeTransformations·ModeratorsIncluded·Meta-AnalyticComputations44PreliminaryResults·OverallAnalysisandHeterogeneityAssessmentoCategoricalModerators§Dependentoutcomemeasure§Complexityofthedecisionproblem§Prese

3、ntationformat§Presentationmaterials§DistractertaskoContinuousModerators§Complexityofthedecisionproblem§Presentationtimeperattribute§TimeforUTandCT§Best/worstratio§Best/second-bestratio75PreliminaryConclusions913AbstractThisarticlepresentsameta-analysisoftheunconsciousthoughteffect(UTE).UTEc

4、anbedefinedasanimprovementofcomplexdecisionmakingbyhavingunconsciousprocessesdealwiththeproblemwhileconsciousnessisdirectedelsewhere.Allavailablestudiesonunconsciousthoughtpublishedineitherpeer-reviewedjournalsorconferenceproceedingswereincludedintheanalysis.ToassesstheUTE,performanceofpart

5、icipantsthinkingunconsciouslyisgenerallyeithercomparedtoparticipantsthinkingconsciously,ortoparticipantswhodidnotthinkatall(immediatedecisionmakers).Acrossatotalof37studies,theeffectsizecontrastbetweenunconsciousthoughtandconsciousthoughtwasg=.244,witha95%confidenceintervalfrom.164to.324.Ac

6、rossatotalof26studies,theeffectsizecontrastbetweenunconsciousthoughtandimmediatedecisionmakingwasg=.400,witha95%confidenceintervalfrom.303to.497.Asestimatedfromarandom-effectsmodel,about80%ofthevarianceineffectsizeswereattributabletotruesystematicvariationratherthansamplingerror.Moderatoran

7、alyseswereconductedtopartiallyexplainthisvariation.TheresultsindicatethattheUTEwasstrongerwhenthedecisionproblemwascomplexratherthansimple,theinformationaboutthechoicealternativeswaspresentedblockedperchoicealternativeratherthanrandomly,whentheinformatio