“我国住宅区街区推广可行性研究”的调研报告

《“我国住宅区街区推广可行性研究”的调研报告》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。

1、项目编号：201610276053大学生创新创业训练计划中期报告项目名称：开放式小区时代的到来？——我国住宅区街区制推广可行性研究项目负责人：马佳茜项目级别：国家级□市级■校级□所在学院：经济法学院联系电话：15921611070指导教师：季奎明华东政法大学教务处制表二○一七年三月39目录第一部分：调研报告汇总“我国住宅区街区推广可行性研究”的调研报告························1实地考察记录······················································13关于开放式小区民众意向的调查问卷···········

2、·······················15关于开放式小区民众意向的调查问卷的数据展示························18第二部分：研究论文探究我国街区制改革对业主权利的影响································21参考文献··························································31第三部分：课题调研心得体会心得体会1·························································32心得体会2·············

3、············································3439心得体会3·························································36心得体会4·························································38第一部分：调研报告汇总“我国住宅区街区推广可行性研究”的调研报告马佳茜张磊摘要：快速的城市化趋势正给我们带来巨大的挑战，但也为社会进步带来了空前的机遇。从封闭小区到街区制的政策转型引发了物业管理问题，建筑物共有部分物权归属问题、居

4、民居住安全以及舒适度问题等诸多争论。通过发放电子和纸质的问卷调查和走访咨询相关专业人员的探讨梳理，可以发现：总体来看，由于政策选项的差异以及政策执行的模糊性，公众对小区开放政策普遍存在误读；细分来看，公众对政策转型的评价具有显著的群体差异，已购房者最不赞成这项政策，其他群体各有自身的利益考量。本质上说，街区制的推广涉及广泛群众的利益，当前加之业主的“共有权益”尚未成熟，个体利益与公共利益存在复杂性，官民之间、公权力和私权力、个益与公益之间的权衡，共同导致形势复杂化。39必须考虑差异因素，切实结合中国国情，在保障实质公平的基础上推动小区开放。关键词：开放性小区；街区制；公私权益

5、，物权归属AninvestigationreportonthefeasibilitystudyofthepromotionofresidentialdistrictinChinaMAJIAQIANZHANGLEIAbstract:Therapidurbanizationtrendisbringingusgreatchallenges,butalsoforsocialprogresshasbroughtunprecedentedopportunities.Fromtheclosedareatotheblocksystem,thetransformationofthepolicy

6、ledtotheproblemofpropertymanagement,therearesomeproblemsofownershipofthebuilding,residentslivingsafetyandcomfortissues.Throughthediscussionoftheissuanceofelectronicpaperandquestionnairesandinterviewsadvicerelatedprofessionalstocomb,canbefound:Overall,thedifferencebetweenfuzzypolicyoptionsan

7、dpolicyimplementation,thepublicwidespreadmisunderstandingofcommunity39policy;subdivision,grouphassignificantdifferenceonEvaluationofpublicpolicytransformation,propertybuyershavethemostdonotagreetothispolicy,othergroupshavetheirowninterests.Inessence,thep