资源描述：
《重新评估《红楼梦》的巨大价值（re evaluation of the great value of the dream of red mansions）》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。
1、重新评估《红楼梦》的巨大价值（ReevaluationofthegreatvalueofthedreamofRedMansions）Reevaluatethegreatvalueof"thedreamoftheRedChamber".".txt,Ican'tbeartobullypeople.WherecanImakeothersbullyme?"Lifeissolong,waitforyouafewyears,countwhatIlove,Iwillpersonallygiveherhappiness,othersIdonott
2、rust,Iwantyou,Imustfindyou,youarenotallowedtobullyhim!OnlyIcandoitallovertheworld!Giveuponyou,nextlife!!ThedreamofRedMansionsiswidelyacknowledgedasthegreatestliteraryworkinChina.Althoughitspredecessorshavemadeavarietyofanalysisandevaluationofit,theauthorbelievesthatit
3、isfarfromtouchingitsspiritualessence.Thedreamoftheredchamberneedstobeinterpretedinanall-roundway,anditstruevaluecanberevealedlater.Wewillbesurprisedtofind"adreamofRedMansions"isnotonlyanovel,itcangobeyondtheirown,beyondtimeandspaceandtheancientandmodernphilosophy,poli
4、tics,art,orevenahundredsubjectseachotherthroughmutualhelp,itismorelikeasphericalmirrorreflectingthelightoftruth.Firstofall,thedreamofRedMansionsisaphilosophicaltreatiseonthestyleofanovel.Theauthoruseshisown"experience"todescribe,inatrue,vividandcompleteway,anexperimen
5、talreportonhowpeopleandsocietyrecognizethemselvesandhowtoachieveselfperfection.Itisnotonlythecharactersandplotpanoramicinterpretationandrevealstheessentialcharacteristicsofthehistoryofphilosophy,Chinafactionsandthechangesoftherelationship,andbasedonthereasonablechoice
6、,combinedwithhispersonalexperience,andbuildanewphilosophicalandideologicalsystem.Theauthor'ssubjectiveintentionistomakethissystemanewphilosophicalpeakbeyondBuddhism,Taoismandconfucianism.Theauthorbelievesthatalthoughthissystemisnotyetrecognizedbypeople,itdoeshavesucha
7、highdegreeofobjectivity.CaoXueqin'sphilosophystartedbreakingDongZhongshu'swrongideastoheaven,independent,locatedinthecenteroftheworld,andthatpeoplewithnatureisdifferentfromthenatureofgoodandevilbalance,unity,abilitybeyondnatureonrationalthinkingandimagethinkingandthec
8、reationofnewvalue.Theacquisitionofthisnewconclusionisnottheauthor'ssubjectivejudgment,butitisduetohisdiscoveryoftheobjective
