the cambridge history of literary criticism vol. 5 romanticism

《the cambridge history of literary criticism vol. 5 romanticism》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、TCHA0126/7/066:15PMPageiTheCambridgeHistoryofLiteraryCriticismVOLUME5RomanticismThislatestvolumeinthecelebratedCambridgeHistoryofLiteraryCriticismsurveysliterarycriticismoftheRomanticperiod,chieflyinEurope.Itsseventeenchaptersarebyinternationallyrespectedaca

2、-demicsandexplorearangeofkeytopicsandthemes.Thebookisdesignedtohelpreaderslocateessentialinformationandtodevelopapproachesandviewpointsforadeeperunderstandingofissuesdis-cussedbyRomanticcriticsorthosethatwerefundamentaltotheirworks.Primaryandsecondarybiblio

3、graphiesprovideaguideforfur-therresearch.Thecoverageofthebook,focussingonthemesandgenresbutdraw-ingindiscussionofthekeyauthors,willensurethatitbecomesastand-ardreferenceworkontheperiodc.1780–c.1830.TheseremaininmanywaystheformativeyearsformodernAnglo–Americ

4、anaswellasEuropeanliteraryhistory.MarshallBrownisProfessorofEnglishandComparativeLiteratureattheUniversityofWashington.HeistheauthorofTheshapeofGer-manRomanticism;Preromanticism;andTurningpoints:essaysinthehistoryofculturalexpressions.Inaddition,hehaspublis

5、hedwidelyinsuchjournalsasPMLA;Criticalinquiry;ELH;StudiesinRomanti-cism;EuropeanRomanticreview;Comparativeliterature;Theeigh-teenthcentury:theoryandinterpretation;Germanquarterly;andItalianquarterly.MarshallBrowniseditorofModernlanguagequar-terly:ajournalof

6、literaryhistory.CambridgeHistoriesOnline©CambridgeUniversityPress,2008TCHA0126/7/066:15PMPageiiTheCambridgeHistoryofLiteraryCriticismgeneraleditorsProfessorH.B.NisbetUniversityofCambridgeProfessorClaudeRawsonYaleUniversityTheCambridgeHistoryofLiteraryCritic

7、ismwillprovideacom-prehensivehistoricalaccountofWesternliterarycriticismfromclass-icalantiquitytothepresentday,dealingwithbothliterarytheoryandcriticalpractice.TheHistoryisintendedasanauthoritativeworkofreferenceandexposition,butmorethanamerechronicleoffact

8、s.Whileremainingbroadlynon-partisanitwill,whereap-propriate,addresscontroversialissuesofcurrentcriticaldebatewithoutevasionorfalsepretencesofneutrality.Eachvolumeisaself-containedunitdesignedtobeusedin