Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf

Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf

ID:34111717

大小:524.49 KB

页数:26页

时间:2019-03-03

Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf_第1页
Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf_第2页
Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf_第3页
Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf_第4页
Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf_第5页
资源描述:

《Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、StanfordLawReviewDworkinandSubjectivityinLegalInterpretationAuthor(s):JamesDonatoSource:StanfordLawReview,Vol.40,No.6(Jul.,1988),pp.1517-1541Publishedby:StanfordLawReviewStableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/1228781.Accessed:02/03/201103:39YouruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyouracceptanceofJS

2、TOR'sTermsandConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.JSTOR'sTermsandConditionsofUseprovides,inpart,thatunlessyouhaveobtainedpriorpermission,youmaynotdownloadanentireissueofajournalormultiplecopiesofarticles,andyoumayusecontentintheJSTORarchiveonly

3、foryourpersonal,non-commercialuse.Pleasecontactthepublisherregardinganyfurtheruseofthiswork.Publishercontactinformationmaybeobtainedat.http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=slr..EachcopyofanypartofaJSTORtransmissionmustcontainthesamecopyrightnoticethatappearsonthescreenorp

4、rintedpageofsuchtransmission.JSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,researchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weuseinformationtechnologyandtoolstoincreaseproductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR,ple

5、asecontactsupport@jstor.org.StanfordLawReviewiscollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoStanfordLawReview.http://www.jstor.orgNOTESDworkinandSubjectivityinLegalInterpretationJamesDonato*SinceRonaldDworkin'srisetoprominenceinthelate1960s,commentatorshavecomparedhisworktothat

6、ofthereigningdoyenofAnglo-Americanjurisprudence,H.L.A.Hart.Thelegalacademiccommunityhastried,forthemostpart,tofittheDworkin-Hartdebateintothenaturallaw-positivelawframework.DworkinhasbeenlabelledaproponentofnaturallawwhileHarthasidentifiedhimselfasalegalpositivist.AsDworkinhimselfhasnoted,h

7、owever,somecommentatorshavewonderedwhetherthedebatebetweenthetwotheoristsisreallyadis-puteatall.'ThesecriticsremarkthatDworkin,theputativenaturallawyer,hasrejectedclassicalnaturallawallusionstogodandnatureinfavorofdrawingonhistoryandcommunitystructureast

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。